• FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Give the Marines a couple to play with, sure, but ALL of them are the version with reduced fuel capacity and no tail hook? VTOL is cool but not that cool.

      • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        The thing to remember is that the UK doesn’t have any CATOBAR capable carriers, so the only F-35 variant they can fly from their carriers is the VTOL capable one.

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          I actually didn’t know that, figured we’d be sharing the electromagnetic one from the Gerald Ford. Certainly wasn’t helped by retiring the Harrier early but seems a wiser strategic move to build a better carrier than keep buying nerfed jets

          • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            You would think, right? They actually originally planned to include CATOBAR capabilities in their new build carriers, but budget cuts due to the cost of it forced them to scrap the idea, and then the rest of the purchase decisions followed as a result.

        • cfi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          The Brits also added an absurd amount of pressure by retiring the Harrier early, leaving the entire Royal Navy with no carrier-capable fixed-wing aircraft until the F-35Bs were delivered