• tremble5218@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Amazon wasn’t caught doing shit. “Caught” implies there is a possibility of consequences. Two days from now nobody is going to remember this story and the world will move on and there will be no consequences for this.

    • derg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      “caught” also implies they’ve been hiding it… It’s been out in the open how they scan books to train AI for a while now.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t think most people realize that the most efficient process for scanning books involves disassembling them.

        So of course they’re upset to hear the books are disposed of afterwards.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        It has been almost a trope that every time the discussion of them buying up the used market and cutting them up to scan, some apologist comes along and says that these books are mass produced garbage and not rare.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Especially since the articles make it clear that the AI companies don’t care about rarity or quality. It’s just a dragnet to get as many books as possible. Sure, a lot of the books are going to be garbage, but some of them are going to be valuable, too.

          The AI must be fed, and the only criterion is the book has to be published before 2022.

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I stopped using Amazon like 8 years ago over various previous inhumane issues

    Seems the rest of the world prefers slightly more convenience

    What are you gonna do I guess

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 days ago

      just remember. the planet is going to be just fine.

      1000004453

      remember how quickly wildlife came back when covid shutdowns hit? it’ll be like that when the last human dies.

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        The last human will be descendant of billionaires who’s lineage lived underground for 8 generations

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Great. The ants, cockroaches and rats will fight over world domination once we drove nearly everything else into extinction. That‘s so reassuring. I only ever cared about the ants anyway. /s

        I genuinely don‘t give a shit about the 99% of the planet that isn‘t it‘s outer crust so obviously I don‘t care if „the planet will be fine“ either. That‘s not mine or your world. Neither is anything that happens in millions of years after pretty much every species we ever knew is no longer there. It‘s such a straw man argument. Nobody is talking about what that clown was talking about when saying „the planet“ and he knew it.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I miss electronics shops :( The chain and small hobby shops around me don’t carry things like resistors and capacitors. I checked every single one. Really.

      Then I bought a lifetime supply of resistors, like actual hundreds, and it was delivered to my doorstep in under 6 hours for $8.

  • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    Can they at least provide all the scans to the public for free? It’s not like anyone is going to care if they violate copyright, that only applies to regular people.

    • irinotecan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      Unfortunately, that would violate copyright law. In fact, the whole point of the destruction is to circumvent copyright, as apparently there was a ruling that scanning, tokenizing, and then destroying the original is transformative enough to be considered, “fair use.”

      • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        You are definitely right. It just sucks that destroying books is “fair use” while using movie clips to make a parody video gets taken down with little recourse.

    • RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s why they are scanning them and destroying them. Someone realized they can capitalize knowledge. We’re going to get the privilege of letting billionaires gate keep information and knowledge

  • supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Where I draw the line for whether it is ethical to light things on fire is when they start destroying rare knowledge and books as fast as possible for no other reason than to hoard and obscure knowledge for private benefit.

    It is one thing to fund the creation of knowledge and then hoard it, it is entirely another to begin actively attacking and destroying pre-existing publicly shared resources of knowledge in the pursuit of monetizing access to that very knowledge behind a gargantuan profit motivated entity.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They would only need a single copy of each book. They aren’t trying to get all possible copies to prevent others from getting them. They are trying to train their AI as quickly and cheaply as possible

  • Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    The most ironic thing is that this is the only way that the current cultural metastasis appreciates rare knowledge. Which we once did!

    Like music it is the most fundamentally human endeavor and it has been destructively gamified. Thank fucking god for libraries, support yours!!!

  • chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    there’s this idea in the AI development zeitgeist that “rare data” is the only advantage left. this stuff is almost certainly motivated by that type of thinking. if they can have data in their datasets that no one else does, they view that as the only way left to be ahead of the competition.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Rare does not mean good. I could write a novel, and it would be fucking atrocious. If I released 5 copies, it would be extremely rare, but it wouldn’t be worth shit.

      • chrash0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        i mean, i’m not arguing for this position necessarily. i agree with you.

        that said, in practice, the “bad data” comes out in the wash. for example, all of Reddit is likely in their datasets. who knows what their data cleaning process is like, but diversity in the data is generally a good thing from a training perspective.

    • tquid@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Think of it like the difference between pulling your car’s registration info and tracking your car across thousands of Flock cameras. At some point, scale is qualitatively different.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you buy a house, it is illegal to set it on fire. It is also illegal to pump infinite molten lead into the soil under your house. It is also illegal to spray aerosolized asbestos out of the chimney of your house 24/7.

      You still own the house.

      • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If I buy a book, it is not illegal to destroy it. Your analogy doesn’t work. You are talking about acts that could affect the health and well being of others.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    Rare doesn’t automatically imply valuable, useful or anything like that.

    My Anthony Fauci x Drowsy Don fanfic is “rare”, but nobody including me would bat an eye if it was destroyed.

    • JustDorky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      You’re so smart and well informed, thanks for sharing those sources and details that provide that context. Awesome work!

    • imrighthere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Rare doesn’t automatically imply valuable

      I agree, there is only one of you, and you’re worthless.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      These books were purchased from booksellers. Booksellers don’t typically carry books that won’t sell. That’s why it’s unlikely these are somebody’s fanfics printed on CreateSpace or something like that.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        They were purchased from Biblio. Literally Biblio’s tagline: “Used Books and Rare Books from Antiquarian Booksellers”

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        Booksellers “carry” utter shit.

        Guess what they do when the book is refunded by the publisher due to bad sales? They cut off the covers and send them back as proof. The pages are destroyed. Nobody bats an eye.

        No publisher or bookseller wants to carry 50000 copies of Joe Bob’s “How to cook maggots” when it flopped

        Also how do you know if my fanfic is a physical book sold at a store or not? 😀

        • DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Also how do you know if my fanfic is a physical book sold at a store or not? 😀

          Because you’re a loggerhead shrike, and you don’t look anything like E. L. James.