• Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ideally it should be supported without deficit or profit by its users. A lot of these old services also accumulate inefficiencies over time that should be pruned from time to time

  • FarraigePlaisteaċ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    There’s a reason flights are so cheap compared to to rail, and it’s not good news for anybody except the CEOs of airline companies. TLDR: they’re subsidised and the fuel is subsidised to artificially price them below public transport. We could have cheap or even free public transport if we wanted using the same method.

    https://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/issues/climate-energy/47717/low-cost-flights-up-to-26-times-cheaper-than-trains/

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh man. I wish that’d work where I live (Canada). Europeans don’t realize how lucky they have it! I can’t fly to any worthwhile countries and back in a day (at least not long enough to enjoy the stay)

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fucking airline companies leeching on government opportunities, fucking train companies that treat train travel as a luxury (ex: fucking Thameslink which is expensive and yet only has seat treys in its first class) and governments not giving train lines the same benefits they give to airline companies are all complicit in environmental crimes.