A growing number of the world’s leading genocide scholars believe that Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute genocide, according to an investigation by Dutch newspaper NRC.

The paper interviewed seven renowned genocide researchers* from six countries - including Israel - all of whom described the Israeli campaign in Gaza as genocidal. Many said their peers in the field share this assessment.

“Contrary to public opinion, leading genocide researchers are surprisingly unanimous: the Netanyahu government, they say, is in that process - according to the majority, even in its final stages,” the investigation concluded. “That is why most researchers no longer speak only of ‘genocidal violence’, but of ‘genocide’.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Article 2 of the Genocide Convention has 5 definitions of genocide, you only have to meet ONE for it to be considered a genocide.

    Israel: Hold my beer!

    https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/genocide-conv-1948/article-2

    Article II

    In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    ✅ (a) Killing members of the group;

    ✅ (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

    ✅ © Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

    ✅ (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

    ✅ (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      According to the experts in the article, it’s determining the intent through observation of action that causes identification to be a spectrum, rather than pass/fail.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s interesting. When I was growing up I was told it had to meet all 5, and the reason for Canada’s colonialism not being considered genocide is that it didn’t meet all 5.

      Of course we all know what Canada did to indigenous folks was actually a genocide but the government would still tell you otherwise. Either way they meet at least 4 of these. Whether you want to say it was deliberate or not I guess is up for debate but…

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, this definition didn’t come about until 1948, I’m rusty on my Canadian history, but I’d assume the colonialism would have been before '48.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you want to be sad, read up on the Residential Schools.

          1948 was 50 years before the last of those hellholes closed.

          And yes, Canada has semi-officially recognized it as a cultural genocide. With actual genocide recognition passed by the House of Commons in 2022.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesring thing to note: doing any and all of the above to people along politically ideological lines is not considered genocide. Millions of civilians have been exterminated because their politics were not national, ethnic, racial, or religious.