• WonderRin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Elon Musk being against the social media ban on under 16-year-olds is him basically reaching a good conclusion from the wrong equation, because he’s not doing it out of privacy concerns about how everyone would probably have to verify themselves to prove that they’re older than 16 years old. He’s doing it because it would not be good for his business.

    I’m not sure how they could implement this without requiring ID verification on every single internet user. I guess I’m not familiar with the topic enough to say if there is another way that they could pursue, but even if there is, at the same time, I’m not too confident in the governments opting for the other options. I’m from neither Spain nor Greece, so I guess I can’t speak on this, but I’m just referring to governments as a general group. And because a lot of different countries are trying to do this at the same time, I’m also not too confident about my own country not doing this at some point, sooner or later.

  • pipi1234@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I was against these kind of policies, but now that I saw Elon’s position I’m reconsidering.

    My logic: The enemy of a paedophile is a friend of kids.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s the argument against a ban? I don’t see a downside to banning social media for kids. In theory they would be forced to build in-person social connections and local communities. After 16 they can expand into the social media space. Personally, I think it should be tied to something like drinking age.

    • elmicha@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      It depends how it will be implemented. Do you want to send your ID to Facebook etc.? Or do you want to make a video call before you can use a social media site? Will only the big players be required to keep your age verification details, or will each forum, each Fediverse site be required to gather and keep your personal ID?

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So the only arguments against the ban come down to how to perform the age verification and not issues with the ban itself. That makes sense. Maybe we could institute some kind of one time passcode where it’s like an MFA for age. Like picture your passport can generate a hash (unidirectional) that just contains like month and year of birth and is verified via PGP with the passport issuing body as the cert authority. So the only actual information you are sending is a hashed and cryptographically verified month and year of birth. That should probably make everyone happy.

    • Darkness343@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Build in person social connections?

      Think of the shareholders! I mean, think of the children who will have to go through that awful process!

    • Lars_Tanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      1. In practice the same system can be used for banning people from social media and communications. Shadow bans etc. Other use in future may be social score.
      2. What’s legal today, may be not legal tomorrow. People will be self censoring.
      3. This gives more leverage for older people over young people, let’s not pretend: people are selfish.