• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m all for this…but why go after a single man who used a tool premade to do the theft, when they could also go after the dozens of AI companies out there that are literally stealing IP to sell to consumers.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Smith was charged in September 2024 with fraudulently obtaining more than $10m in royalty payments by amassing as many as 661,440 streams daily between 2017 and 2024, yielding annual royalties of $1,027,128.

    This already deserves movie adaptation.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Disclaimer: fuck AI.

    I don’t get it. Is it illegal to make songs with AI? Shouldn’t they be going after the AI companies?

    You don’t go after the user, you go after the dealer.

    This whole thing stinks of being set up by AI companies to set some precedent.

  • albert_inkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    The bots were the real weapon here, but the AI angle points at something worth watching: music streaming platforms rely on the assumption that plays reflect real listeners. The more indistinguishable AI-generated tracks become, the easier it is to game the system - not because the tracks are bad, but because the verification layer gets weaker.

    What keeps this system honest now? Mostly good luck and the assumption that most people won’t bother. Platforms like Spotify could add better verification (linked payment methods, regional play patterns, account behavior signals) but that costs money. Easier to just prosecute fraudsters retroactively and call it solved.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Sounds like the botting was the problem, not the AI-generated tracks. He could’ve done the same with sounds of nature or some other shit like that.

    Clickbait is strong with this post.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    The case against Smith highlights a growing problem for the music industry that had largely recovered from the Napster music piracy era of the early 2000s only to be faced with an AI-based threat to revenue from music streaming platforms such as Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify and YouTube Music.

    This is supposed to make me feel sympathetic to the multi billion dollar corporations? Fuck all the way off with that shit.

  • ji88aja88a@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    when do the ai owners start paying the damages on stealing content to power the models? it’s kinda the same…

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    While I am not against AI as a tool, this person being a tool with AI generated slop remixes everywhere as a hustle is not approve.