• teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      They want to be able to remotely disable vehicles, but in the process have made us vulnerable to all sophisticated actors to do so. Our leaders have their priorities all screwed up.

      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wait, are you telling me…

        …that a device meant to disable a vehicle

        …was used to disable a vehicle?

        Whould’ve thought?

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It makes sense - a self-contained device can be circumvented. A connected solution is much, much harder to fool