deleted by creator
Who would vote for it other than Sanders?
Dems are as deep in the tank for the AI companies as any Republican.
50% might have been a fair cut if they actually asked for permission up front,but they didn’t. Everything made by AI is fruit if the poison tree and should be something equal to public domain.
50% seems very low. They created these companies by scraping and pirating information.
50% means that they just need to fool a few people to get what they want. Imo it should be more like 90% public with a requirement that all services must be provided for free.
When I found out what it meant when other countries have sovereign wealth funds…
I have no idea how most people in America keep convincing themselves they’ve somehow got a good deal.
How about a 50% stake in all companies valued over 5 billionaire dollars.
Pretty horseshit to act like they trained AI on only American data so only Americans should benefit.
What about the literal entire rest of the world? They get nothing right?
Just another example of America exploiting the world for their own benefit. Even the good ones are so corrupted by their system that they do it without realizing.
The biggest flaw, aside from it having to succeed in our corporate owned Congress, is that it would require these companies to actually make money, and based on the technology we have today, that seems unlikely to happen anytime in the next decade. At least not without some major technological breakthrough. But it’s better than nothing I suppose.
If this ever passed, I bet we’d see a pretty quick devaluation in these things.
I’m okay with that. The bubble is going to burst eventually.
check my math:
0.5 x 0 = 0
Wouldn’t this make everyone interested in the bad business practices that would increase the profits?
It makes sure that the public benefits from mass automation.
Government. We are not the government.
https://cdn.mises.org/anatomy-of-the-state.pdf
It’s a very short book. And it’s covered pretty convincingly in the first chapter no less.
Yes but stocks go up when AI gets more market power, exploits more privacy, sells more data to vested interests. The public would then have an interest in all that. Or at least this interest would compete with privacy interests. It may make it harder to push the company to do something, no?
50% too low.
I see what you’re going for, but… No thanks.
This kind of bill is the only way we ever get any kind of UBI and the closest thing to taxes these companies ever pay.
Just ban running them on a loss. Maybe even ban running anything at a loss in order to curb competition, etc.
That’s great for the US, but these companies are fucking the whole planet. What will the US do when other countries hold them responsible?
Hold what? Who?
Maybe you’ll be a good fit for joining the league of nations. You see, they are the seed for the world government, and they’re going pretty well /s
Funny - bis Argument is : ai is built in human collective knowledge thus wie should participate in the profits and … Give it all to americans
Dont get me wrong i like the sentiment - but seems like it comes down to - ai was built by THe collective knowledge of all humans - the profits should go to all americans
Other countries are free to do that for any LLMs developed in their own jurisdiction.
