• Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, the older ones of the rotating backups are still readable.

    But that’s not even the actual problem nowadays: CDs and DVDs were nice when their size was still relevant in comparison to usual amounts of data. The real problem behind their decay is that we are lacking a widely available, properly scaled backup solution for more than a decade. So the mean reason people have now unreadable optical data is that they stopped thinking about it a long time ago for an utter lack of options.

    • mbirth 🇬🇧@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      So the mean reason people have now unreadable optical data is that they stopped thinking about it a long time ago for an utter lack of options.

      Well, there are 100GB and 120GB Bluray M-Discs. But yeah, the only things larger are either spinning rust (i.e. HDDs that need to be refreshed regularly to prevent bit rot) or very expensive LTO hardware and tapes.

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Still got a shelf full of 360 discs, I refuse to open them and hope that the cases they’re in protect them for life longer than mine.

  • WormFood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    A small handful of my burned CDs from 20 years ago are unbearable and as far as I can tell, none of my pressed CDs are. I’m sure they’ll rot eventually but I think your average cd is quite robust. Still, there’s no excuse not to have backups!

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Burned CDs use photo sensitive ink to create the 0s & 1s, while pressed CDs physically alter the plastic. Even archival CDs were only rated for like 25yrs