Actually, I think it’s terrible anyone remotely jewish gets hate targetted at them because the hater in question conflates being jewish with being pro-Israel/genocide.

The problem is that there is inherently a large overlap of these 2 groups,and those within that overlap are often the ones we see most in the media.

If you compare polling data with media representation, there is a strong indication that those that are jewish, but critical of Israel, will see retribution or get shunned from their communities, as the article shows. So fear of reprisal is silencing the voices trying to differentiate jewishness from Israel.

Problem is, people who only read headlines or watch 5min of news in the doctor’s office will only ever see the pro-Zionist jewish representatives. So to them, only that overlap exists,hence the antisemitism.

So no, I’m not blaming the victim here, because the real victims are those jews who get bashed for something they aren’t supporting. I do blame the scum that think there is nothing wrong with firing tank shells at unarmed, starving people queueing to get food, simply because they’re Palestinian. You can call it racism if it makes you sleep better at night, I just call it disliking people being dicks to eachother.

Edit: To add, I think the enablers like Bezos & Murdoch are just as evil bastards, regardless of ethnicity or religion. And yes, that includes Hamas as well, especially the leaders living in luxury in Qatar instead of standing among their starving population.

Don’t worry, I’m sure your first understanding of “they” was also correct, just not said out loud.

After all, why punish criticism of Israel if they don’t feel that Bibi & Co speak for them?

This is the type of behavior that makes anti-semitism rise in Europe, all because some corrupt, power-hungry, racist twat is afraid of spending his retirement in jail. (And I’m sorry you are ethnically linked to the cunts that cheer him on)

If I ever get a time machine, I’m gonna go back and make Abraham disappear. It’ll be 3 religious birds with 1 stone!

When Trump says he holds all the cards, I always think of games like Uno, or Blackjack. Meanwhile the rest of the world is playing chess.

Technically, they do pay it … but nothing stops them charging US consumers for it first.

Keir Stramer has orange lips.

He’s dying to use a nuke, just to put his name in history books.

I hopethey hang them in the boardrooms, or maybe the mens room.

But Miss, he started hitting back first!

Ukraune gave up nukes for safety guarantees.

The US diverted missiles meant for Ukraine to Israel, which were then promptly fired on Iran.

Why the fuck would Iran even consider not having nukes when we are witnessing the result live?

Is that the self-driving spybase that’s doing so well in LA?

Not in NA, also don’t have room in my apartment for a big CO2 bottle.

Could put a big one in the garage and refill my own cartridges, but still a bit of a hassle to set up, not to mention I’ld need to invest in the big tank first.

How antisemitic of you!

/s

My bottles need renewal at the end of the year and I’m tempted to throw out the whole system.

Biggest problem is finding gas canisters without their logo plastered on them.

Do you mean this one?

Ukraine gave up nukes in direct exchange of US & USSR/Russian guarantees of independance and is in the middle of getting royally fucked by both sides.

Why would any Iranian government with half a brain give up nukes? They work!

They already have called it “antisemitic terrorism” even though the attacker turned himself in to building security right after.

Considering the victims are rumored to be an engaged couple and the perpetrator been seen waiting, I’m thinking a more personal motive like jealousy, or a specific case, rather than racism.

He just cares about making “great television” and boy, did the world watch the last Oval Ambush!

Predicting it now:

This aid will only be allowed into the south of Gaza. Between food and a ground assault, they’ll have the carrot and the stick to push Palestinians out of the north, which they’ll then annex “occupy indefinately”.

Article is wrong on a major point though:

They are not undoing the phase-out part (actually a cap on the active lifetime of a reactor), but lifting the ban on building any new reactors. There is no deal to maintain the currently active plants any longer than what the previous governments negotiated with Electrabel/Engie over and they are still poised to close qs planned

This change is here because the ban included medical/research reactors, such as the one in Mol that used to provide chemo-therapy products, which we are now buying abroad.

As for the other arguments usually found on this topic:

• Belgium lacks the space for a scaling-up of windmills, and with the control-components found in chinese transformers, (who have a 80% market share in solar) it would give the Chinese government the power to literally damage our infrastructure, or cause shutdowns like Spain & Portugal saw. All without leaving evidence behind, btw. So an energy reliance built on Chinese products is as dangerous as building it around a Russian gas pipeline.
• Nuclear power has a lower CO2 footprint per GW, lower injury & death toll, and isn’t even the top radiation pollution source. (That’s actually coal, with Wind a potential second if we had more data on Bayan Obo)
• While >90% of solar panels currently in use globally have no pre-determined disposal, Belgium does require a contribution to Recubel on sale, so their waste which can contain stuff like PFAS atleast won’t end up in a landfill. There is no national recycling plan for windmills as far as I could find.
• The largest cost of nuclear power is safety. Both reactor & waste. The largest gain is a massive amount of reliable electricity. Unfortunately, due to how global energy markets work, the profit has become unreliable (ironically in part due to solar/wind) and large nuclear plants are generally considered an economic loss. That’s why Engie doesn’t want to keep the nuclear plants open anymore, they make more money from “emergency capacity” subsidies not running gas power plants than actually producing electricity in Doel & Tihange. But if someone figures out a way, why would you stop them from innovating? Not to mention the law also banned any potential ‘safe’ methodin the future, like Thorium reactors, fission, …
• It’s still legal to build a coal plant in Belgium, the government only regulates safety & waste when you do. This law repeal puts nuclear power at the same level as all other sources. It is up to the experts at FANC to define what a safe nuclear plant is, and to investors if the think it’s worth the cost, be it financial, PR, or other.