Any US company that wants to could setup mining operations in greenland today, Denmark/Greenland would happily welcome the development.

The reason the USA wants to seize greenland is because it foresees a future where it is no longer allied with Europe, so in order to secure the resources and military access in the long term they are annexing it now since Europe is entirely incapable of stopping them at present, both politically and militarily.

Why have all these “x-point plan” been so horrifically poorly written?

14 A is a sentence fragment that has no meaning.

5 B, Does not restrict Ukraine from continuing the war to reclaim it’s territory since the occupied areas are not “Russian territory” and it simultaneously states that if Russia militarily opposes that recapture it would trigger the security guarantees and enter NATO into war with Russia.

18, “as soon as possible” is such a cliche contract trap, just write 6 months and there wont be any arguing.

It’s like a child wrote it, but this is being presented in a serious international forum. The original one from Russia and Europe’s modification thereof were also just absolute garbage.

Worked pretty well for turkey, they shot down 2 russian fighter jets, resulting in the death of 1 pilot. Russia did not violate their airspace again.

This really doesn’t have much to do with Nestlé. This is about the purchasing habits of consumers in different markets as influenced by global wealth inequality, lacking education, and inadequate access to healthcare. While large corporations absolutely have certain influence on those factors, this issue of more sugar in some products is so far downstream from the real problems that it’s just a useless distraction.