Tbh with you I think it’s lower than that when the temps are over 100, much less over 110. However, I don’t know the exact number. I think it depends on other factors. In a situation where we’re talking about regular folks having to do several specific things to survive, humidity easily breaks our little scenario.

I can tell you that I’m from the swamp. I can do up to around 103 with humidity over 70% but the cone for survival begins to narrow dramatically above 95. In the desert with humidity at 14%, I was completely fine at 110 even in the sun for periods of time. Like, I thought it was in the high 80s.

But, I can sweat gallons as long as I have water. That’s what my body is conditioned to do. In the actual, ancient desert, without constant access to water, I’m dead. I assume most people can’t just sweat two gallons a day, drink two gallons and eat some spicy food, and be ok tomorrow again. I also assume actual desert natives handle 110 different than me too, in a more desert sustainable way.

If we’re talking about bare survival of a healthy or generationally conditioned person, able to do the right things, with access to everything they need, I think you’re right 40% doesn’t break things, but I assume none of those things apply in France.

What you’re saying is true, but only under specific circumstances. If you’re conditioned for it and you take precautions, if this is your daily, it’s doable. 109 with very low humidity, a nice breeze, in the shade, with dessert clothing, and a healthy supply of clean water, is ez if you are used to it and know what to do.

If you aren’t used to it, or don’t know what to do, or it’s 40% humidity, or there is no shade and you’re letting the sun hit your skin, etc, will easily kill you. This is France my man. Not wherever you’re from. These temps, just hitting the normal vegetation will ensure the humidity is unbearable. Much less everything else.

Bullshit. If Israel gets pissy enough they’ll drop a nuke. Iran cannot remain defensible if they let either Israel or America destroy the countries around them.

The only reason Iran wasn’t beaten into submission by the US is because trump’s whole thing is to pretend to lose accidentally so he can wash money through the system and siphon it out. He’s been doing this his entire life, and the fact that people think this is anything but that, is startling.

trump and the boyz are skimming billions off this thing every single day. Keeping it on the edge like this “win-lose-win-lose” allows those in the know to siphon off a country sized chunk of money every single breath.

Iran only cares about those because they know if they let Gaza and Lebanon fall to Israel unopposed, Iran is next. It’s complete self interest.

So it can cover, cane, and oppress them.

There are no good guys here. Mommy and Daddy are fighting to see who gets to fiddle the kids.

Weapons have been banned before, but nukes are the only things that actually don’t get used. A ban on automous weapons will require the same situation. A country is going to have to kill hundreds of thousands, or millions of people at once, and then everyone will have to stockpile these as a deterrent against use.

Even then, that’s just against other countries. Nobody stops nations from doing anything and everything to the citizens they own.

To your second point about shelling, I disagree. This is different in extremely important ways. These are cheaper to create, easier to run in undetected, and do far far less collateral damage.

They are also a relatively new technology. You could have looked at the first muskets and said "definitely an advantage, but not an insane amount compared to seasoned archers and siege equipment. We can’t really compare unguided munitions in their highly evolved form, to autonomous drones that are just getting started.

The only thing that could have stopped this would have been the lower classes, worldwide, becoming a unified front for the last century or more. These killbots are not only here, already and being used, they will become the default within 5 years. Watch.

None of the world’s governments have lifted a finger in the last year of continuous, televised genocides of civilians, women, the elderly, and children. They certainly aren’t going to draw a line in the sand for unseen killbots that nebulously might be responsible for some civilian deaths at some point in the future.

Not only will these be used in war, these will be used in civilian life too. How do you think the world’s wealthy plan to stay that way?

They know very well that in the past when inequality has risen to these levels, they fall. They know it’s because no guards will chose them over the mass of, now angry, people that the guards were birthed from and spent their lives with.

The killbots are for you and me baby. It is already written.

I love how we call 4 Republicans out of 217 “bipartisan”

The life blood of the mountain. The people who the mountain has chosen as most deserving. Discarded like the shit of a rich-boy college student who paid the equivalent of a lifetime for a Sherpa family, just to have a cool photo on insta for 3 days.

Why was he crawling back? Why weren’t they searching for him at some point before? Because he didn’t have a northface jacket and skin as white as snow.

Everest itself was more compassionate to him than the entire colony of mountain leeches that infest it.

Holy shit. This is like going from a pirogue to a prop plane.

If there was someone else in his place they might not have survived.

Yeah, all the personal trainer, equipment that costs more than an indigenous climber will make in a lifetime, years of training, macros, protein, and gyms, can give you a body that is 1% as fine as a human being that just hasn’t been turned into a predigested monkey genetically bred to live only in a machine.

Unfortunately using calcium carbonate (CaCO3) from this process to make calcium oxide (CaO) for concrete would release whatever carbon dioxide (CO2) you sequestered in the process.

As you can see, to get CaO from CaCO3 you have to remove a C and two O’s. or properly put, a CO2. Doing this would actually release more CO2 than you sequestered originally because to get that CaO you’d have to heat up the calcium carbonate to a few thousand degrees again, burning more coal or whatever to create the heat.