The link is now broken for me too. I happened to have it bookmarked after having a very similar conversation about it when it was posted to reddit from gizmodo.

https://academic.oup.com/carcin/article-abstract/47/1/bgag015/8555982?login=false

Go to the guardian article from the OP. Find the link that was in the image I posted. Its pretty close to the top.

Are you actually reading my messages or just getting a vibe and running with it or what? That picture wasn’t meant to be scientific evidence it was simply to demonstrate the falseness of your point about the actual scientific paper not being linked in the article.

I can tell you are defensive about being treated as stupid which isnt what time trying to do. Actually read what my comments say please.

Here’s the link in the article, that you said you couldn’t find.

Look i see what you are doing. You half read a few studies 10 years ago now recent science is beneath you. Its obvious, and I want you to know its obvious.

Can you not see how biased and untrustworthy you sound? You effectively admitted to not even reading this study.

Have you researched the issue recently. Because some of the stuff you said was stuff I read about when I started vaping like 10 years ago. Like the stuff about it being too hot. Its something I see repeated a lot by people who dont want to see reality.

Yes, a study, many years ago, did that. But did this study do that? You cant keep trotting that line out and expect it to stay relevant.

Ive stopped vaping as of last year, but it was obvious to me the flavour compounds were a complete unknown.

Is it? Why? Thr word paradise was, let’s say CHARGED, but lots of low skilled immigrants are absolutely flooding Germany looking for benefits right now.

Yeah, lots of sour grapes in here. It’s kinda pathetic.