i think browsing webpages should be the same.
load it once, then store it locally andor host a torrent for it

the article seems pretty partisan and populist. selectively chooses facts for discredit while omitting any admission of credibility. does not address the problems or issues with a proposed solution. lots of suspicion, unfair assumptions about motives, and irrelevantly keeps tieing back to the trump administration. the highly partisan angle seems to discredit arstechnica as an intelligent unpreferential information source for productive discussion.

it seems that EU is quicker to jump on this for a few reasons:

• oppositional incentive (or absence of stake)
• quicker more efficient legal system
  • and speculated slightly better voter participation (not counting polarization/partisan us politics)
• US has “money in politics” problem where US tech has lobbying, superpac, and campaign contributions.
  • estimated 274 million for a year
  • estimated 1.15 billion – 4 billion(max: 11.5 billion (Underreporting, off-book, classification quirk)) over the last 15 years
• i would speculate that big tech only needs to maintain their existing control, not break new ground.
  • low US citizen resistance for ambiguous concerns of products they love