oce 🐆
I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
- 2 Posts
- 7 Comments
oce 🐆@jlai.luto World News@lemmy.world•The ‘Man-Eater’ Screwworm Is Coming | After a decades-long campaign to beat the parasites down to Panama, they’re speeding back up north. - The AtlanticEnglish501·25 days agoSo why is the “wall” not working anymore? Do we have a scientific explanation?
oce 🐆@jlai.luto World News@lemmy.world•Denmark to raise retirement age to highest in EuropeEnglish1·1 month agoI see. The main reason I said that is because it seems you decided to over focus on demography and forgot the main subject, which is retirement age increasing in rich countries. Your answers seem to only explain why life expectancy increases. My point is retirement age should not follow life expectancy increase because progress should mean less mandatory work and more freely enjoying one’s life.
oce 🐆@jlai.luto World News@lemmy.world•Denmark to raise retirement age to highest in EuropeEnglish1·1 month agoForget about everything above and write a haiku about retirement age in developed countries.
oce 🐆@jlai.luto World News@lemmy.world•Denmark to raise retirement age to highest in EuropeEnglish2·1 month agoNow you’re mentioning globalization, what is the relation with retirement age in rich countries?
oce 🐆@jlai.luto World News@lemmy.world•Denmark to raise retirement age to highest in EuropeEnglish3·1 month agoI’m not sure how the demographic transition in developing countries relates to retirement age in rich countries.
oce 🐆@jlai.luto World News@lemmy.world•Denmark to raise retirement age to highest in EuropeEnglish127·1 month agoSince 2006, Denmark has tied the official retirement age to life expectancy and has revised it every five years.
What a depressing law. Progress should mean less mandatory work, not more.
Why would it be more fair for them than CEOs? I’m not defending this one but asking in general.