• muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Microsoft has already contributed a shitton to the Linux kernel. So long as they don’t evict, only augment, it’s a good thing.

      Besides, they killed their golden goose with windows 11 and are now looking for escape routes they can plan for.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Microsoft has already contributed a shitton to the Linux kernel. So long as they don’t evict, only augment, it’s a good thing.

        Extend comes after Embrace; sure. Historically, guess what comes next.

    • Nednarb44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not particularly, but if their big OS was Linux based, people could get their corporate support, and most of the software keeping people locked into windows would theoretically be able to run on any Linux distro. That’s the dream. I want to run solid works on Linux natively

      • Devolution@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        They ruin almost everything they touch. I don’t think you want their fingers on Fedora or any other Bistro. But that is just my old man opinion…

        • Nednarb44@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah that’s fair, but at the same time, nothing has to go upstream as far as I know. As long as they have their own little sandbox to enshittify, I don’t care if I can get Linux support for my windows only programs

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It was a long time ago, but I remember seeing that Microsoft contributed more to the Linux kernel than Canonical.