• geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    27 days ago

    Can the blind anti LLM jerk stop already it’s the same 2024 2025 arguments. Agentic coding has massively improved this year even local open source LLM’s are getting good

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      We’ll stop when the AI evangelists finally learn the idea of consent and quit trying to force AI down everyone’s throats nonstop.

      You want to shrivel up your brain with AI? Go ahead, you’re an adult (presumably) and I’m not your mom. Go access it through a browser or separate app. Quit trying to force it into my face by integrating it into the OS or DE. And while you’re at it, quit continually going “BuT dId YoU cOnSiDeR tHiS???1?” like a door-to-door salesman that jams their foot in the door so you can’t close it

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        This is the exact opposite. Trying to ban AI from everything despite its use cases.

        Many people don’t know this but even Luddites didn’t oppose machinery. They simply opposed the ownership structure of it. So instead of saying “no LLM” you could say “Open-source/weight LLM’s allowed only”.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          This is the exact opposite. Trying to ban AI from everything despite its use cases.

          This is a pure, bold-faced lie. But this is nothing new from AI evangelists.

          This is about banning AI contributions from specific open-sourced projects. This is due to a number of legitimate concerns that are still not solved, such as maintainability and how AI development legally interacts with licenses such as the GPL

          You want to go and start an open sourced project that uses AI from the start? Go ahead, nothing is stopping you. You want to install AI programs on your OS? Go ahead, nobody is stopping you

          But don’t cram that bullshit into the OS itself. Doing so then forces AI onto everybody whether they want it or not, and that’s bullshit

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            This is about banning AI contributions from specific open-sourced projects.

            Do you even know what Codeberg did?

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              26 days ago

              A single repo hub doesn’t want to host LLM-generated code. It’s not like there aren’t others that are friendly to LLM-code, including the largest one: GitHub. And GitHub will never ban LLM code, they’re too integrated with it. And Codeberg is just a specific Forgejo instance. Nothing is stopping you from hosting your own if you really want to.

              You’re taking a single instance of a provider adding an extra stipulation to their TOS and equating it to governments banning the use of LLM’s. It’s not, and the government isn’t going to be taking away your LLM. Quit acting like it is.