• illi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    If you want to optimize a parent-child time with AI, maybe optimize it with not having children instead.

    • cman6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Exactly what I was thinking. It makes me think of the book Four Thousand Weeks, and Chasing Daylight.

      The former is about the trap of productivity and thinking you can fit more into your day than you can. Hint: no matter how much you get done in your day, you will want to try to fit in more

      And the latter I don’t want to spoil but there was a quote along the lines of “Gene looked at all his colleagues who wanted more and thought, do they know when they will have enough?”, again the idea that we will always want more.

      Reading to your child and spending time with them is enough. Forget all the other distractions the world offers you.

      /rant

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Now this is the correct answer.

      Not sure what to tell those who thought they’d give it a whirl and found out it wasn’t for them, however 😅.

    • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Politicians and governments around the world are already thinking we don’t have enough babies being born. Soon they will want to incentivize people to have children because of AI too. Just more “reasons” to justify it with the thought up ones already.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Big Tech spent years designing platforms that steal our attention, then sold us AI tools to compensate for the time we lost. Now apparently even spending time with your kids is inefficient. The endgame is becoming obvious: humans do the work, AI gets the attention, and Silicon Valley collects the subscription fees. Apparently being a parent is just another productivity bottleneck.

    • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 days ago

      Apparently being a parent is just another productivity bottleneck.

      Always has been. Women have been paid less or just fired because they want to take care of the children. Usually by the same people complaining there aren’t enough kids now.

  • rustbuckett@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 days ago

    Funny story. My cousin’s parent were super christian religious. The sect where they “speak in tongues”. Anyway, they would play bible readings on tape to him at bedtime. One night, they started the tape and left the room. Some time later they heard him screaming from Hus room. Of course they came running in and found him in tears, utterly panicked. The stereo had eaten the tape or died (I don’t remember), and he thought that god had died.

    So yeah. Should be good.

    • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      And yet they did and he we are commenting on imaginary actions by imaginary people

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    I love when a news article just summarizes tweets. Couldn’t they at least reach out the dude to get some more background?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I agree, though sometimes in retrospect after they see how they’re post lands they will retroactively claim they didn’t actually mean it. So have to take rationalizations with a grain of salt.